• Competition key to safeguarding property market from Royal Commission fall out

    New


    Author: REIWA President Damian Collins

    Earlier this month, the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry handed down its long-awaited findings.

    No additional lending criteria a win

    REIWA was pleased to see there was no directive included in the findings to introduce any additional criteria that may affect people’s ability to borrow for housing.

    While the tighter lending standards currently in place have had the desired effect of cooling the red-hot Sydney and Melbourne markets, this blanket-style approach has had plenty of repercussions for our local market, which is still struggling to find its feet. It is our hope that this stringent lending criteria imposed by the lenders and the regulator can now be relaxed.

    Recommendations around mortgage broking problematic

    One of the other big talking points to come out of the Royal Commission surround the recommendations for mortgage broker commissions to be replaced by fees paid by the applicant.

    While many real estate agencies have in house brokers or alliances, our main concern as an industry is to ensure that any changes to the fee structure do not limit competition and do not impose additional costs on borrowers.

    The broking channel has opened up the opportunity for many securitised lenders to get loans to market and compete with the major banks. This competition has reduced the Banks’ net interest margins from around 3.5 per cent to 2.2 per cent in the last 20 years, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia. On a $1.7 trillion loan balance, ABS data shows this is saving Australian borrowers $22 billion in interest per year.

    Flipping the script so that the borrower pays the brokers’ fee may have merit in theory, but with it comes the potential to deter people from opting to use brokers all together. This will reduce competition and the end result may be that all borrowers end up paying higher interest rates.

    The Royal Commission has suggested as an option that the government also impose a fee if a consumer borrows directly from a lender, and that the fees be capitalised into the loan. This will ultimately increase the cost of buying a house, doing nothing to help the ever-present issue of housing affordability. Not to mention this amount will then be compounded by interest over the life of the loan.

    Handing power over to the big banks will undoubtedly see interest rates increase. Giving the consumer the choice and power to easily navigate the multitude of lending options through the use of a broker has been proven to increase competition and lead to lower interest rates for borrowers.

    We must avoid knee-jerk reactions

    While mistakes have been made by the mortgage broking industry we must ensure that the government does not apply a sledgehammer approach to fixing the problem without adequate foresight into the repercussions on the market.

    Any policy that diminishes competition in lending or reduces housing affordability will cost us all dearly, not just mortgage brokers.